Setting The Record straight: The Truth About The Louis Guthrie Because Truth Matters

May 12, 2012 3:06 pm 5 comments

After listening to Chris Baker, radio talk show host on KSEV, on the way home, and reading Davie Jennings’ article claiming a victory for Louis Guthrie in his recent court case contesting the circumstances under which he was fired from the Sheriff’s office, I do feel compelled to set the record straight, because, as Mr. Jennings says “Truth Matters”.

Please allow me to remind you why Mr. Guthrie was fired in the first place.  The ABC video, linked here, gives a good synopsis of the alleged official oppression charge of which Mr. Guthrie is accused, for shutting down a car wash business because he suspected that $17.00 had been stolen from his wife’s car.

The final court order has no reference to a victory for Louis Guthrie, nor does it say anything about being vindicated, getting his old job back, getting back pay, or any of the many other truth-stretching claims coming from Guthrie supporters.

To quote David Jennings, from Big Jolly Politics, in article dated May 6, 2012

Following a bench trial in District Court, Louis Guthrie was vindicated, and the Sheriff’s Civil Service Commission’s decision to uphold his firing was set aside and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with the Court’s Order. What does that mean? It means that after the Court found the Civil Service Commission, and vis-à-vis the Sheriff, had violated the Texas Government Code, the decision in violation of State Law was set aside. Louis should get his job back along with back pay and benefits.

Unfortunately, there is not much truth in the above statement, from Big Jolly Politics.

The actual court order is located here.

On April 16, 2012 a hearing was held in the 295th Civil District Court, Judge Caroline Baker presiding. The hearing was an appeal of the firing of Louis T. Guthrie from the Harris County Sheriff’s Office by Sheriff Adrian Garcia and upheld by the Harris County Civil Service Commission.

After hearing oral arguments from both sides, Mr. Guthrie and Harris County, Judge Baker made a ruling that the Civil Service Commission made an error in law by not addressing the issue of Mr. Guthrie not being provided a copy of the complaint. She therefore remanded the case back to Civil Service for further proceedings.

While this is a great victory for all employees of the Sheriff’s Office as this violation has been the norm in Internal Affairs investigations the battle is not over. There was nothing stated in the ruling absolving Mr. Guthrie of any of the actions for which he was investigated and terminated.

To quote the actual Order: “One of Guthrie’s grounds of error is that the disciplinary action taken against him was not in compliance with section 614.023 of the Texas Government Code and that this noncompliance requires the he be reinstated. Guthrie is correct in arguing that Chapter 614 of the Texas Government Code controls in cases such as this; however, the Court does not agree that such error requires it to order his reinstatement.”

It is apparent that the Court could find no error in his actual termination except for the technicality of not receiving a copy of the complaint which is a procedural error not necessarily an error in upholding the termination.

It is my understanding that Harris County is appealing this decision and knowing how the courts move a hearing on this appeal will in all likelihood be at some future date well past the primary and more than likely after the general election.

Should Harris County decide not to appeal the ruling and rehear the case in Civil Service, the Commission could still rule to uphold the termination. It would seem that to meet the requirements that Judge Baker remanded the case for all they would have to do is address the issue with the County Attorney to ensure that the Sheriff’s Office will in the future provide a copy of the complaint to employees involved in the future and provide Mr. Guthrie with a copy of his own at that time. This would meet the requirements set out in the Government Code and nullify the error in law.

To put all this in simpler terms, Mr. Guthrie’s case is far from over. He has not been absolved of any wrong doing in his actions for which he was terminated. While there is evidence and documentation that he did not violate the law it is entirely feasible that he did violate Harris County Sheriff’s Office’s departmental policy which could garner him disciplinary action from anything from documented counseling, letter of reprimand and/or suspension, and even termination. Mr. Guthrie still has an uphill battle with an unsure outcome. Remember you can win a battle and still lose the war.

Ref. 295th Harris County Civil District Court  case# 2010-35811

While I admire the enthusiasm of Mr. Guthrie’s supporters, I would ask them to restrain their comments to avoid being stretched to the point of prevarication.  This, unfortunately, is a common trait of some of Mr. Guthrie’s supporters.  A sure sign of desperation, and a losing campaign, when one has to lie in order to bolster their candidate’s credentials.

The actual court order is located here


  • Guthrie just sounds like an bully. I couldn’t believe that a guy that was fired from the Harris County Sheriffs Office for such abuses would actually come back and run for Sheriff. That takes some nerve.

  • Mr Guthrie does not exhibit the needed character to hold the office of Sheriff.
    Question – would the use of the rank “Lt.” be improper, due to his current status?
    Is the misuse of departmental resources, and essentially trumping up the incident, also covered under official oppression charges?
    To what charge will he be indicted once this takes place – I did not see an amount the charges are based (forgive me if I missed it). State Jail Felony?

  • Not only that, he’s hired a known and repeat offender image thief and copyright violator, Ms. Candice Schwager to work on his campaign.
    See below for the details and be sure to read the comments. Lots of online investigating went into calling her out for what she is, a liar and a thief!

    • Wow. Her comments are absolutely nuts. She is threatening to sue the person that she stole images from? Attacking the victim? This person really works for Guthrie, Al?

  • “To put all this in simpler terms, Mr. Guthrie’s case is far from over[...]Mr. Guthrie still has an uphill battle with an unsure outcome. Remember you can win a battle and still lose the war.”

    Richard, it looks like you have been proven correct. The HCSO did appeal and they did overturn Judge Caroline Baker’s decision and in fact said Guthrie did receive a complaint and therefore no procedural error was found. Good Job! file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/AppellateOpinion.pdf

    I feel like Im writing from the future to let you know what will happen since I noticed all the comments here are two years old.

Leave a Reply


Other News

  • Faith Houston Update: Woodfill v Parker

    Update: Woodfill v Parker

    I want to bring to your attention recent developments in our case against Mayor Annise Parker.

    As you probably know, the Mayor of Houston, Annise Parker, has worked to suppress the voice of 55,000 Houstonians who petitioned our government to hold a referendum vote on her ordinance that allows, among other things, biological males who are gender confused to use a female restroom and locker room. As a result, we filed suit, Woodfill v. Parker. Mayor Parker has now embarked on a city-wide intimidation campaign of area churches. It is nothing less than a full assault on our pastors’ religious liberties as provided by the First Amendment. As part of the litigation, Mayor Parker has subpoenaed the communications of local pastors, including their sermons and private messages. The Mayor got a few sermons herself from key leaders on her outrageous vendetta.

    Read more →
  • Faith Houston Stand with Houston Pastors, Sign The Petition

    Stand with Houston Pastors, Sign The Petition

    I recently had the honor of standing with state leaders in support of five Houston pastors that have come under attack by Houston Mayor Annise Parker. These pastors have been targeted for their role in speaking out against Mayor Parker’s liberal LGBT agenda for the City of Houston. Her agenda, as outlined in a recent ordinance, would allow members of the opposite sex to use each other’s restrooms under the false premise of “gender identification.”

    Many elected officials and organizations, including Senator Ted Cruz, Attorney General Greg Abbott, State Senator Ken Paxton, State Senator Dan Patrick, Senate candidate Paul Bettencourt, Texas Values, and the Houston Area Pastors’ Council, have spoken out publicly against the Mayor’s assault on religious liberty. We need more Texans and elected officials to publicly stand with these brave pastors!

    Read more →
  • Houston Pennington Demands Mayor Annise Parker to Withdraw Subpoenas Issued to Five Houston Area Pastors

    Pennington Demands Mayor Annise Parker to Withdraw Subpoenas Issued to Five Houston Area Pastors

    District G Council Member Calls Administration Action “Unimaginable”

    Houston—District G Houston City Councilmember Oliver Pennington today called on Mayor Annise Parker and City Attorney David Feldman to withdraw the subpoenas issued to five Houston area pastors for communications with their congregants. In his statement, Pennington said, “Earlier in the week I was disappointed when I learned that the City of Houston had issued subpoenas for the sermons of five area pastors. I was disappointed that the City had taken this action that undermines the First Amendment rights and freedom of religion guaranteed by our Constitution. Our founders put protections in place to protect citizens and religious institutions from government, not the government from its citizens.”

    Read more →
  • Family Houston Mayor Parker’s Assault on Houston Area Pastors

    Mayor Parker’s Assault on Houston Area Pastors

    Mayor Parker recently subpoenaed the sermons and other communications belonging to several area pastors in a lawsuit in which the pastors are not even involved. It appears Mayor Parker is very concerned about the lawsuit we filed after the city council rejected valid petitions to repeal a law that allows members of the opposite sex into each other’s restrooms. Mayor Parker is demanding that the pastors, who are not party to the lawsuit, turn over their constitutionally protected sermons and correspondence so she can see if the pastors have ever opposed or criticized her and/or her agenda for the City of Houston.

    Mayor Parker is an employee of the people, not a dictator who will not tolerate dissent. She has decided to use the power of the state to suppress the First Amendment freedoms enjoyed by Pastors and all Americans.

    Read more →
  • Houston A Time To Make Tough Decisions

    A Time To Make Tough Decisions

    On Wednesday, June 18, Houston City Council will consider and vote on the City’s annual budget. Despite our region’s economic boom, the City faces serious fiscal challenges. I’m not one to place blame on how we got to this predicament, but as a City Council member and concerned citizen, I am determined to ensure that the City finally takes specific steps towards a real and viable solution.

    The City’s general fund budget grew by over 7.46% in FY13, 7.18% in FY14, and the Mayor’s budget for this year proposes to increase spending by 8.24%. Furthermore, the Mayor proposes to draw down the City’s “fund balance,” or savings account, by $41 million this year to pay for operating expenses.

    Next year, the Administration forecasts a deficit of $141 million. Even worse, the deficit is scheduled to increase exponentially in subsequent years.

    Read more →