Character Assassination at Big Jolly Politics

November 5, 2011 1:41 pm 6 comments

It has happened.  Dems could not win Houston with factual arguments or on principle, so they have resorted to ad hominem attacks and pejoratives to distract voters from the issues and generate sensationalism in the place of logical debate.  This should come as no surprise.  What should surprise Houston voters is that supposed conservatives are sabotaging their own front-runners with the very same venom commonly expected of Dems.

Republican poser and career hack Dave Jennings at Big Jolly has injected his own brand of name-calling into the local political discourse.  Avoiding the more sophisticated pejoratives, e.g. “Fascist,” “Racist,” and/or “Xenophobe,” terms typically directed at conservatives with good ideas and principled stands, Jennings has opted for the locker-room slur of past decades, calling upstanding GOP candidate Brian Cweren “gay.”  That such childish mudslinging can even pass for political dialogue in Houston is laughable.

As Jennings wrote at Big Jolly,

Mr. Cweren is a candidate in District C and I have to admit that I scratched my head the other day when I got an eblast from HCRP Chairman Jared Woodfill stating that the party had endorsed Mr.Cweren but my puzzlement was because his positions on the issues seemed at odds with the party’s goals – I had no idea he was gay, nor would it have mattered to me. But I don’t remember a time when the party endorsed an openly gay candidate. What makes it amusing is that at the same time, the party elders continue to criticize Houston Mayor Annise Parker because she is, well, gay! She’s a lesbian, dontcha know! And then on the radio, I hear uber Republican Paul Bettencourt endorsing Dave Wilson for mayor because, well, Mayor Parker is promoting a homosexual agenda!

Ya can’t make this stuff up! Ain’t politics a blast?

The logic employed by Jennings is that Cweren has no wife or ex-wife, apparently making him “openly gay.”  This sort of pedestrian, slanderous rant should give people a good chuckle, only that it is doing damage to the level of discourse in Houston, reducing ideological discussions to contests over who has the best and most derisive slur.  Furthermore, Jennings posting the response from venerable GOP consultant Eric Weinmann is no retraction, and readers should not view it as such.  These false and tasteless comments must be fully withdrawn. That either camp is having to spend even a second responding to such third grade antics should shame Jennings.  But then, distracting voters from the issues is probably Jenning’s intent.  To be fair, the claim that Cweren is gay originally came from Don Hooper at the Houston Chronicle, but the regurgitation by Jennings of this baseless accusation clearly carries an ulterior motive.

It is becoming ever more apparent to those watching that Jennings does not actually support conservative solutions to the present challenges facing the nation since Jennings spends so much time trying to make conservatives into hypocrites, instead of talking about conservative policies that work.  Most likely a “closet” centrist that discounts conservative arguments offhand without examining their salient features, Jennings opts for vicious and personal attacks against conservatives, substituting genuine rebuttals of conservative principles with silly insults that would make those who accused Christine O’Donnel of being a “witch” blush.  How embarrassing?  Is this the best one of the most widely read GOP-endorsed blogs on the net can do, to tear down upstanding candidates with conservative platforms?  What is even more strange is that Big Jolly is considered conservative.  None of the content ever veers beyond Clintonian centrism.  At Patriot Statesman, open dialogue between opposing points of view is encouraged, despite Patriot Statesman’s default alignment being conservative (a fact which Patriot Statesman does not conceal) unlike Big Jolly, which bills itself as conservative while spewing venomous vitriol at the very people it purports to represent.  As Jenning’s states in his “About” section, “My goal here is to have ‘voices’ that represent many sides of conservatism and Republicanism. As well as libertarianism.”  These “voices” seem to be nonexistent on Big Jolly.  Using content alone at Big Jolly as a barometer, in what universe can Jennings claim to represent conservatives?  Jennings claiming his content represents conservatism is akin to Romney claiming he opposes ObamaCare on philosophical grounds.  If the evidence is any indicator, Jennings is a plant, a troll with a blog, and those who have made the mistake of thinking he is conservative have been duped.

Character assassination is not a valid or indeed adequate response to Cweren’s ideas or his platform.  Big Jolly readers deserve better.  Conservatives deserve better.  And good men like Brian Cweren deserve better.

6 Comments

  • This is nothing new for Little Folly he has a history of attacking good honest people. That is why the Chronicle likes him..He means nothing in the BIG picture…

  • Eric Weinmann

    We have a case of supposed small government conservatives taking money from big government liberals and using it illegally. When they’re caught, they simply dig the grave deeper and negligently libel others. We’re dealing with some unstable folks who are happy when big government liberals win.

  • Time to start suing media publications who publish false allegations without solid evidence so FREEDOM OF SPEECH does NOT become Freedom of slander and personal destruction!

    • I do not like the thought of having to resort to suing people but we as a people to stand up for truth. If someone makes a mistake that’s one thing but out and out lies meant to destroy that is another. Little Folly has a history of lying and working to destroy good people.

      This type of hate filled propaganda is harmful to our nation. This is meant to keep good honest people out of politics out of fear of people like this.

      Brian is a good man and if anyone has anything to say otherwise show the evidence our shut up…

    • Brandon De Hoyos

      As a journalist, I can tell you a lot would have to happen for such a suit to be successful. First, they would have to prove Jolly knowingly knew it was false, and two, published with a malicious intent. Libel suits are very hard to win because the burden of proof rests on the victim.

      WIth that said, I think the best way to take care of Big Jolly is to stop reading his garbage and encourage others to do the same.

      • you are right I normally do ignore him and so do many others except for those who fear him. He has a ong history of hate and I do feel sorry for him. It must be hard living with that much hate inside.

        Since he is so hateful of Republicans the local paper now picked him up as a conservitive blogger to help promote his anti Repilican hate, its a real shame that the press as a rule acts this.

Leave a Reply


Trackbacks

Other News

  • Family Houston Mayor Parker’s Assault on Houston Area Pastors

    Mayor Parker’s Assault on Houston Area Pastors

    Mayor Parker recently subpoenaed the sermons and other communications belonging to several area pastors in a lawsuit in which the pastors are not even involved. It appears Mayor Parker is very concerned about the lawsuit we filed after the city council rejected valid petitions to repeal a law that allows members of the opposite sex into each other’s restrooms. Mayor Parker is demanding that the pastors, who are not party to the lawsuit, turn over their constitutionally protected sermons and correspondence so she can see if the pastors have ever opposed or criticized her and/or her agenda for the City of Houston.

    Mayor Parker is an employee of the people, not a dictator who will not tolerate dissent. She has decided to use the power of the state to suppress the First Amendment freedoms enjoyed by Pastors and all Americans.

    Read more →
  • Houston A Time To Make Tough Decisions

    A Time To Make Tough Decisions

    On Wednesday, June 18, Houston City Council will consider and vote on the City’s annual budget. Despite our region’s economic boom, the City faces serious fiscal challenges. I’m not one to place blame on how we got to this predicament, but as a City Council member and concerned citizen, I am determined to ensure that the City finally takes specific steps towards a real and viable solution.

    The City’s general fund budget grew by over 7.46% in FY13, 7.18% in FY14, and the Mayor’s budget for this year proposes to increase spending by 8.24%. Furthermore, the Mayor proposes to draw down the City’s “fund balance,” or savings account, by $41 million this year to pay for operating expenses.

    Next year, the Administration forecasts a deficit of $141 million. Even worse, the deficit is scheduled to increase exponentially in subsequent years.

    Read more →
  • Culture Houston Houston Chronicle Editorial Board criticizes Jared Woodfill For Opposing NDO

    Houston Chronicle Editorial Board criticizes Jared Woodfill For Opposing NDO

    In a recent OpEd titled, “Pass the NDO,” the Houston Chronicle Editorial Board criticizes me and others for opposing an Ordinance pushed by Mayor Parker that would allow, among other things, men who identify as women to use women’s bathrooms and locker rooms. Specifically, the Board states, “Perhaps Woodfill and his ilk would like Parker to institute citywide restroom monitors to assuage their fears.” This is preceded by a subtitle that states, “There is little value in spreading hatred about the transgender community.”

    Whenever and wherever sexual politics is involved, labels are employed to shoot down valid questions about the impact of legitimizing certain activities in the public sphere. The latest in this long string of debates involves Mayor Parker’s proposed city ordinance that would allow, among other things, men who claim to identify as women to use women’s restrooms, locker rooms and other gender-specific facilities.

    Read more →
  • Houston Mayor Parker’s Compromise Makes Sexual Predator Protection Act Worse!

    Mayor Parker’s Compromise Makes Sexual Predator Protection Act Worse!

    After hearing from tens of thousands of Houstonians opposed to Mayor Parker’s Sexual Predator Protection Act, the Mayor recently claimed she was removing the “Bathroom Language” (Section 17-51(b)) which allowed gender confused individuals to utilize the bathroom associated with their gender identity/preference or expression regardless of their biological sex. The Mayor claims she is compromising on her original position. Unfortunately, Mayor Parker’s personal, social agenda dominates her decision making and one must study the language of the Ordinance to appreciate the deceptiveness of the alleged compromise. The Mayor’s “compromise” actually makes the Ordinance more egregious and dangerous to our families.

    Read more →
  • Houston Stop Mayor Parker’s Sexual Predator Protection Act

    Stop Mayor Parker’s Sexual Predator Protection Act

    Last week, the Houston City Council “tagged” (delaying the vote for one week) a vote on Mayor Annise Parker’s ordinance that elevates sexual preference, same sex marriage, and gender confusion to legally protected status. Over ten amendments were presented and tagged.

    It is time for conservative business leaders, community leaders, elected officials, and individuals to take a stand against the personal agenda Mayor Parker is attempting to force upon businesses, churches and religious organizations. It is important for council members to know that we oppose Mayor Parker’s ordinance. It is critical that you continue calling, emailing and faxing city council members. Please forward this email letter to your family, friends, neighbors and business associates and ask them to let their voices be heard.

    Read more →